Just an update to this - Moved the tail to a gig subint, and shaping is now working as expected (So portchan is the issue) - Was going to open a tac case, but looks like smartnet on a 7200 w/ G1 is in the order of $3K?! I might try a pay per-incident case...
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:50:51 -0700 From: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] policy map shape being "ignored"? To: [email protected]; [email protected] My guess is that shapers not supported on port-channel interfaces. We've got a similar issue and it's on my to-do list to convert the port-channel back to a single interface to test and see if this is indeed the problem with the shaper (you've just reminded me I need to do this !). regards, Tony. From: CiscoNSP List <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 13 September 2013 5:58 PM Subject: [c-nsp] policy map shape being "ignored"? Hi Guys/Girls, 7200/G1, have other policy-maps/shaping working without issue, but the following one seems to be ignored? policy-map 10M class class-default shape average 9800000 104000 0 interface Port-channel1.1019 encapsulation dot1Q 1019 ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.117 255.255.255.252 service-policy output 10M #sh policy-map int po1.1019 Port-channel1.1019 Service-policy output: 10M Class-map: class-default (match-any) 1664453 packets, 1933030626 bytes 30 second offered rate 55140000 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: any Queueing queue limit 64 packets (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0 (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0 shape (average) cir 9800000, bc 104000, be 0 target shape rate 9800000 IOS bug? _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
