Which IOS are you using? El 08/10/13 09:53, Octavio Alvarez escribió: > Wait a minute... My router supports "reload reason" already and rejects > "reload int 10". > > Check later IOS versions. > > On 10/07/2013 12:05 PM, Pete Lumbis wrote: >> The two outputs do have different warnings: >> >> reload reason: >> =========================== >> Router#reload >> Proceed with reload? [confirm] >> =========================== >> >> =========================== >> Router#reload in 5 >> Reload scheduled in 5 minutes by console >> Reload reason: Reload Command >> Proceed with reload? [confirm] >> =========================== >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Octavio Alvarez >> <alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org <mailto:alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org>> wrote: >> >> On 10/07/2013 05:30 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote: >> > If we fix the behavior what does the fix look like? Do we not >> allow any >> > reason that starts with "i"(in) "c" (cancel) or "a"(at)? But then >> what if >> > you want a reload reason of "reload installing new software"? >> Should this >> > be blocked? >> >> Create "reload reason blahblah" and deprecate "reload blahblah". Issue a >> warning each time "reload blahblah" happens. >> >> Also have different confirmation messages. "Reload in 10" could have >> "Proceed with reload in 10?" while the other could be "Proceed with >> immediate reload?" >> >> >
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
