Oh my. It's part of the VTP specification. "VTP frames being sent over a distance of 20 light years will be dropped at random."
Or they are just the same as any other frame :) Sent from some sort of iDevice. On 31/10/2013, at 7:30 PM, Andrey Teslenko <teslenko.and...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > We observed problem with VTP. VTP updates does not advertise between two > switches in the same vtp domain > > > > It seems to me that happened because the distance between switches is too > long, approximately 40km > > > > Who ever observed the same problem? > Could distance affect on convergance of VTP? > > > > This problem temporary solved after recreating of vtp domain name. But we > afraid that this problem will repeat. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/