Hi folks Is the 901 that different form 903 As on 903 it is possible to accomplish the below config on 15.3(2)S1a (03.09.01a.S)
adam -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pshem Kowalczyk Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 7:43 PM To: Fredrik Vöcks Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR 901 EoMPLS Hi, The only way we could get the L2 forwarding going on ASR901 was using a single service instance with encapsulation default (this only works in newest software): interface GigabitEthernet0/8 no ip address negotiation auto no keepalive service instance 1 ethernet encapsulation default l2protocol forward xconnect 10.123.129.3 34322 encapsulation mpls mtu 9000 kind regards Pshem On 19 November 2013 02:11, Fredrik Vöcks <fredrik.vo...@bredband2.se> wrote: > Hi all, > > We are having a customer who says he can't forward BPDU packets over > an portbased EoMPLS using an ASR 901. > > Is this something known or am I missing something? Relevant > configuration; > > interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1 > description c_customer433231 > no keepalive > xconnect x.x.x.x 1730 encapsulation mpls > > /F > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/