Does the command exist in 6.1(3)? I don't have a box that I can test with.
-----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey G. Fitzwater [mailto:jf...@princeton.edu] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 3:19 PM To: James Slepicka (c-nsp) Cc: Jeffrey G. Fitzwater; Tim Durack; Gert Doering; Christina Klam; <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Third party transceivers that fail only with new, NX-OS 6.2.2a on sup-2E In 6.1.3 I never had to add the command; but now with 6.2.2a I have to. Are we having fun yet.. Jeff On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:46 PM, James Slepicka (c-nsp) <cisco-...@slepicka.net> wrote: > Just talked to my SE. He reports that, in previous versions, some 3rd party > transceivers (mine included, apparently) work without "service > unsupported-transceiver". This was 'fixed' in 6.2(2)... > > Thanks for reporting this, Jeff. We'll be upgrading soon and this saved me > from a big headache. > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > Of Jeffrey G. Fitzwater > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 2:33 PM > To: Tim Durack > Cc: Gert Doering; Christina Klam; <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Third party transceivers that fail only with new, > NX-OS 6.2.2a on sup-2E > > My error. Yes it does exist. Not sure what I did wrong. > > i am going back and try new code with command. > > > Thanks > > Jeff > On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Tim Durack > <tdur...@gmail.com<mailto:tdur...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > "service unsupported-transceiver" works for us on 6.2.2a. > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater > <jf...@princeton.edu<mailto:jf...@princeton.edu>> wrote: > I don't see the "service unsupported-transceiver" command nor does it run > (in case its hidden). That would imply its not there on 7k 6.1.3 or > 6.2.2a. > > > Can you imagine us doing an upgrade on one of our core 7k and having all the > transceivers fail. > > Jeff > > On Nov 19, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Gert Doering > <g...@greenie.muc.de<mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 03:59:06PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: >>> I would love to condemn the product managers who make this sort of >>> rage-inducing decision to an eternity of dealing with 02:00 >>> maintenance windows where you're stuck in a data centre with severe >>> time constraints, the network is down because of transceiver issues >>> and you only have the wrong brand of transceiver to hand, and >>> there's no reason it shouldn't work other than vendor politics. >>> <RAGE/> >> >> Amen. >> >> (The "service unsupported-transceiver" thing used to be a reasonable >> compromise. It gave customers the freedom of choice, while making it >> clear that TAC could refuse to support issues with 3rd party transceivers. >> Sorry to hear that the Nexus BU is now competing with the Stupid BU >> for the "most annoying BU CY2013" title...) >> >> gert >> -- >> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! >> >> //www.muc.de/~gert/<http://www.muc.de/~gert/> >> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany >> g...@greenie.muc.de<mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de> >> fax: +49-89-35655025<tel:%2B49-89-35655025> >> g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de<mailto:g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list >> cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list > cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > -- > Tim:> > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/