On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 11:32:25AM +0000, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 05/02/14 20:23, Charles Spurgeon wrote: > >FYI. We recently encountered an inline packet crash bug that took out > > Can you clarify what "inline packet crash bug" means? It's not a term > I'm familiar with.
You're right, the usage is unclear. As far as we can tell, packet traffic through the router triggered the crash. This does not appear to have been caused by punt packets to the CPU. However, we have no details. All that we know for sure is that both routers crashed at the same time. > However: I would be cautious about saying much more in a public forum. > If this really is a 1-packet crash of a sup2T, you should go to PSIRT > with a high priority. We don't have any detailed info on the packet contents or quantity. I agree that the vendor should take action to protect their customers from this kind of exposure. -Charles _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
