On May 4, 2014, at 1:26 PM, Justin M. Streiner <strei...@cluebyfour.org> wrote:
> I remember hearing a while ago that Cisco was working on a competing > technology to flowspec, but no details were available at that time. You're thinking of this, which they didn't implement properly, and eventually EoLed because they'd made a dog's breakfast of it: <http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/sec_data_tidp_tms/configuration/12-4t/sec-tidp-tms-12-4t-book/sec-tidp-tms-eol.html> They're now (finally!) implementing RFC5575 flowspec. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
