Plenty of people are using them in data centers with ToR switches which you could consider a very similar design. Cisco just has a different team for "campus" vs "datacenter" for whatever reason so they work with different products. Most campuses used 6500s so they are familiar with IOS, VSS maybe and that's why they propose the 6800. Nexus is a new OS to learn, has some different redundancy models, etc.
I can't see any reason why the 5K wouldn't work. Maybe check into longer reach optics support if that is necessary. High density low power datacenter switches don't always support longer reach optics, but I'm not sure about the 56128. Phil -----Original Message----- From: "Antoine Monnier" <mrantoinemonn...@gmail.com> Sent: 6/12/2014 11:38 AM To: "Michele Bergonzoni" <berg...@labs.it>; "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Is the Nexus 3064PQ usable ? Thanks Michele for sharing the feedback you received on this. Our cisco sales rep is telling us that he has never heard of Nexus used as a campus distribution-layer and is trying to convince us that that Catalyst 6807 is the right choice (instead of Nexus 56128P), even though we would get less 10Gig port-density, 1:2 oversubscription, 5x more RU used, at least twice the power consumption, etc... and all of this for twice the price! Are there other people out there using Nexus (3x00 ? 5x00? 6x00 7x00?) at the distribution-layer of medium-sized campus? Medium-sized being about 60 access-layer closets with dual 10 Gig uplink each and a small server-farm. On the downside I hear that the "orphan port" scenario with vPC may be a pain in the back side? I still need to read the details of this. Is anyone running vPC at the distribution-layer of a campus environment? Thanks On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Michele Bergonzoni <berg...@labs.it> wrote: > Does anybody have success/horror stories about the [Nexus] 3064 or 3048 to >> >> share? If you email me in private, I can post an anonimized summary. >> > > I received two very helpful replies. > > One person told me about some new 3172PQ: "I am loving them to death". > This person is using them as L2, with vPC. > > One person is using the 3064X with OSPF, BGP VRRP and is happy with it. > This is very similar to what I am trying to do. > > I still feel a bit uneasy, but I think we will end up trusting the > datasheet. > > Cheers to all, > > Bergonz > > -- > Ing. Michele Bergonzoni - Laboratori Guglielmo Marconi S.p.a. > Phone:+39-051-6781926 e-mail: berg...@labs.it > alt.advanced.networks.design.configure.operate > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
