This C6880-X is a very interesting box, very powerful indeed. The only drawback is that it doesn’t have redundant RSP/Sup however it can be stacked together.
Would have to read through the documentation to find out about the MPLS features’ availability. Though the data-sheet claims full MPLS/VPLS functionality. Since it is Sup-2T based it should have the same features as 7600 right? adam From: Tim Durack [mailto:tdur...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 3:54 PM To: Vitkovský Adam Cc: sth...@nethelp.no; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] why there are no plans for A903-RSP2B-240 please????? May not have all of the SP features you need, but the C6880-X is an interesting semi-fixed platform. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Vitkovský Adam <adam.vitkov...@swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk>> wrote: > From: sth...@nethelp.no<mailto:sth...@nethelp.no> > [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no<mailto:sth...@nethelp.no>] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 3:21 PM > > > MX240 is too big however MX104 is exactly what I was talking about. > > MX104 is a very nice box, as long as you can live with its limited CPU > horsepower. We'll be installing several of them soon. > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no<mailto:sth...@nethelp.no> Well I'm pretty annoyed by the asr903 limited CPU horsepower. Reloading the box takes ages also saving config introduces a very 90's style delay. Does MX104 support LFA or rLFA please? adam _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Tim:> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
