Can you share these outputs from both routers ? "show cef fib" "show cef table"
Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP) amsoa...@netcabo.pt http://www.ccie18473.net -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gabriel Sent: terça-feira, 12 de Agosto de 2014 14:36 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 RAM Hi, we have 2 ASR1001 in one location. They each receive a full table from different providers and have an iBGP session between them. One of them generated this message today: *Aug 11 23:11:16.983: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" For some reason, it only saw 500k prefixes today (I'm assuming the provider is doing some aggregation before sending the full table?). I had to put some filtering in place and then re-enabled CEF. IOS-XE version is 3.07.01.S.152-4.S1 We have the exact same setup in another location (with different ISPs). The only difference is the IOS-XE version: 3.06.00.S.152-2.S. I saw one of these exceed 500k and there were no error messages whatsoever. On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Rich Lewis <rle...@sis.tv> wrote: > Those memory figures below are from an ASR1001 running IOS-XE 03.09.00.S / > 15.3(2)S. > > What was the image that you ran into memory issues with? Just so I > know to avoid it! :-) > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gustav UHLANDER [mailto:gustav.ulan...@steria.se] >> Sent: 09 August 2014 23:33 >> >> Yea that depends on sw version. >> We ran into the issue when upgrading to a newer image on routers that >> receive full feeds from upstream. >> Sent it to tac and they said it was memory issue. >> >> Skickas med OWA för iPad >> ________________________________________ >>> Från: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> för Rich Lewis >>> <rle...@sis.tv> >>> Skickat: den 6 augusti 2014 21:30:55 >>> >>> >>> FWIW, we have full tables on an ASR1001 with 4GB RAM, and with >>> add-path >>> enabled: >>> >>> 503890 network entries using 124964720 bytes of memory >>> 982424 path entries using 110031488 bytes of memory BGP using >>> 281251490 total bytes of memory >>> >>> I guess it depends what else you're doing, but 4GB would seem ample >>> on the face of it. > > > ********************************************************************** > > Satellite Information Services Limited. Registered Office: Whitehall > Avenue, Kingston, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK10 0AX. Company > No. 4243307 > > The information in this email (which includes any files transmitted with it) > is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. Unauthorized > recipients are required to maintain confidentiality. If you have received > this email in error please notify the sender immediately, destroy any copies > and delete it from your computer system. > > ********************************************************************** > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
