Hi, On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Chuck Church wrote:
That seems crazy that 4GB can't support a full table. I know the ASR halves it's memory to support SW redundancy, but still. You don't have SSO configured on the ASR do you? I saw that that split the memory in half once again. Not at all necessary on a 1001.
<snipp/> There was a lot of talk on asr1001 ram about a year ago on this list. If I remember correctly whatever amount of physical memory you have in the box the IOS process gets exactly half of it with the other half being dedicated to other processes running alongside the single ios process. So even without the IOS redundancy feature this gets you down to 2 GB for your IOS process on a 4 GB box. There was even less ram visibile inside the IOS process and routes and such seemed to take much more memory than on classic ios boxes. So the box was quite full with 2 full ipv4 bgp feeds. The boxes in question have since been upgraded to 16GB with third party memory and everything is fine now. Regular experience just does not apply to this box. It just looks similar but is totally different under the hood. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: c...@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart Mobile: +49 171 1947 843 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer Web: http://www.cksoft.de/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/