Could be a duplex / autoneg issue? If not, then was the same port used on the C3925 for each scenario? Different types of ports on these boxes have different hardware capabilities.
Nick On 12/11/2014 13:28, Matthew Huff wrote: > What size is the link between the 6500 and the c3925? What line card do you > have on the 6500 that is connected to the c3925? > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of R LAS > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] strange issue on mcast flow > > Hi, > I've tricky problem: > > Net scenario > Multicast Provider --- link 1Gbs --- c6500 --- c3925 (NAT/ACL) --- 1Gbs link > -- customer > > When my multicast provider have some spike I see a lot of input > errors/overrun on C3925 and customer experience loss of mcast flow. > > Then I tried to move the link directly in an interface of C3925 (doing NAT > and ACL) bypassing C6500 and do not see anymore input errors/overrun > > New Scenario > Multicast Provider --- link 1Gbs --- c3925 (NAT/ACL) --- --- 1Gbs link -- > customer > > Any idea why this could happens ? > > Greetings > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
