Thanks Dip for the doc link... Here's the doc explaining what the TAC had me do to fix this...
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/multiprotocol-label-switching-mpls /mpls/29828-mplsvpnte.html#case2 Case 2: VPN over a TE Tunnel When the TE Tunnel Is from PE1 to P2 Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 11:49 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Aaron; aa...@gvtc.com Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS-TE on ME3600 On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 11:22:56 PM Aaron wrote: > Wow that was interesting. Cisco TAC just informed me that when an > MPLS TE Tunnel exists on an ME3600 that is also acting as a PE for vrf > traffic that you want to flow via the tunnel, you must add "mpls ip" > to the tunnel interface. > > That's it. That fixed my problem. Yes, that seemed like the most probable issue when I first read your original post. > Does anyone know where to read about that issue ? Online in someone's > website ? Or cisco.com ? The TAC seemed to think there wasn't going > to be a document that > explained something like that. :| Well, for some reason, it has been a long-held recommendation (at least on this list) to enable LDP over RSVP at all times, i.e., configure "mpls ip" under your tunnel interfaces. I know Oliver used to push that quite a lot back in the day, and somehow, it stuck. On the otherhand, it's probably a good idea to have it as an official recommendation as a design document on Cisco's web site. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/