Hi Brian,
no ES/SIP cards needed. This is on a simple WS-X6704-10GE card.
It has been working for years already, lowest version tested was on
12.2(33)SRE6.
Please note that you can not do VPLS with the Sup720, this is just for simple
P2P tunnels (EoMPLS).
Regards,
Chris
On 28/11/14 09:24, b.turn...@twt.it wrote:
Hi Chris
Don't you still need es/sip cards for this ?
If it has changed it would be great.
Thanks
Brian
Hi Simon,
you can also do port-to-subint on the Sup720 using ethernet interworking:
one end:
interface TenGigabitEthernet3/2
xconnect y.y.y.y 1 encapsulation mpls
end
the other:
interface TenGigabitEthernet4/2.2010
encapsulation dot1Q 2010
xconnect x.x.x.x 1 pw-class atom-eth-iw end
The magic is in the pw-class atom-eth-iw:
pseudowire-class atom-eth-iw
encapsulation mpls
interworking ethernet
We're using that in production and it works just fine.
Cheers,
Chris
On 27/11/14 12:10, Simon Lockhart wrote:
In simple terms (and I apologise if this is fixed in Sup2T, as most of
my experience has been on the Sup720), with the 6500/6800 platform,
you can only do port-to-port or subint-to-subint VPWS, but not
port-to-subint (which you can on the more capable boxes, or with the ES
cards on the 6500/6800).
Simon
On Thu Nov 27, 2014 at 11:05:18AM +0000, R LAS wrote:
Hi Simon
can you detail more "ASR9k can be more flexible on EoMPLS (VPLS) than
6807" ?
Regards
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:26:55 +0000
From: si...@slimey.org
To: dim0...@hotmail.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR vs 6807
On Thu Nov 27, 2014 at 10:18:41AM +0000, R LAS wrote:
Discussing a new architecture of DCI (Data Center Interconnection),
Cisco raccomends both ASR9k and 6807. The architecture requested
by the customer forecast MPLS/VPLS supported by DCI.
From pricing point of view there is a quite big difference (win
6807), from feature point of view Cisco says the difference is
"only" the number of mac-addresses supported and the sw modularity.
Can anybody help in digging more the "technical" difference ?
I'm going through much the same at the moment, and settling on 6807,
largely from a price perspective.
ASR9k is (today) a more capable box for routing - particularly if
you want higher bandwidths. ASR9k has 100G ports today. 6807 only
has 40G. ASR9k can be more flexible on EoMPLS (VPLS) than 6807.
6807 has a lot of potential (880G per slot), but it's not supported
by either Supervisors or Linecards that are available today (current limit
is 80G/slot).
Simon
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
