On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 14:09 +0000, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 03/12/14 12:50, Peter Rathlev wrote: > > > (PS: It has to be pure IP as seen from the rest of the network, so no > > MPLS unless it's something like MPLSoGRE.) > > For curiosity - why *not* MPLS? It really sounds like a job for VPLS, > but you obviously have some reason not to do that.
Well, I need to attach these devices to the access ports on the edge of the network. For a VPLS service I would need to privison an MPLS enabled VLAN on the access layer, wouldn't I? That seems rather complicated though this might just be my inexperience saying that. > You'll probably want jumbo frames on the "outside" IP network of course. Good point. Jumbo frames wouldn't be a problem, all devices in the varios paths accept at least 2000 bytes frames. Thanks! -- Peter _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/