The short version: http://xkcd.com/463/
-Blake On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:51 AM, GSW <[email protected]> wrote: > If you're exposing your control plane to possible attack vectors, you have > serious architectural issues... > > The reason you don't see many exploit tools is because the control plane > isn't generally exposed (and the needed proximity i.e. being able to pass the > frame to a port that will accept an mpls packet) > > The control isn't even exposed to other providers - NNI is generally the tool > of choice there > > >> On 9 Dec 2014, at 11:07 pm, M K <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi allHave anyone tried tools for MPLS networks penetration testing? >> Thanks >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
