Hi, Yes, agree that the new ASR920 is the one you should be looking at.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-920-series-aggregation-services-router/datasheet-c78-733397.html If you go with the ASR-920-24SZ-IM you can add a 2-port 10G interface card to get 6x10G on the box (oversubscribed, though). We have just ordered one of these and hopefully they will turn out to be a good choice. /Ulrik -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: den 18 mars 2015 08:49 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X On 18/Mar/15 09:37, CiscoNSP List wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Looking at both of these boxes to terminate 10Gb Aggs and a bunch of either > VRF or VPLS tails...3800X looks to support more VRF's(2000 instances) vs 128 > on the ASR902...but we only need a 2 or 3, just a heap of subints/vlan ints > in the same vrf, but the 902 looks to be able to give me (With 8x1 Interface > module x 4 ) 32 x 1Gb ports and 4 x 10Gb ports...price-wise they look pretty > close...am I missing something with the ASR902...as they look like a really > nice alternative to the ME3800X.....3800X will only give me 24 x 1Gb ports > and 2 x 10Gb ports...so would need more of them to accommodate the number of > 10G ports I need. The upgrade path for the ME3600X/3800X is the ASR920. I'd consider the ASR920 if you're looking at the long-term. My only disappointment with the ASR920 as of today is that the 4x 10Gbps uplinks do not have 40x or 48x customer-facing ports. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
