Steve, Please refer to the QOS section in the following Cisco Live deck. ASR920 has the same behavior. It will give you an idea about the QOS architecture and how to construct your policy in Cisco ASR920. http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxtd2FyaXN8Z3g6NzI1MTc2YzdjNGI2YmQ1NA
Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Routing Segment wa...@cisco.com<mailto:wa...@cisco.com> Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 <http://www.cisco.com/> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to:http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: "cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>" <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>> on behalf of Steve Margelos <smarge...@atlantech.net<mailto:smarge...@atlantech.net>> Date: Monday, July 20, 2015 at 10:51 AM To: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>> Subject: [c-nsp] ASR 920 - H-QoS across 2+ EFP interfaces Hello, I have an ASR 920 that I will be using to form an NNI with an upstream provider. We typically have customers that purchase not just an internet circuit, but also P2P/VPLS services all over the same single physical circuit. We then separate these services out into logical units on our NNI so that we can take appropriate action, depending on the inner C-VLAN that we see coming from the remote CPE. The problem I am having is designing/implementing a QoS solution that will take into account multiple logical circuits, while still allowing me to prioritize certain types of traffic. Normally, we use Juniper to accomplish this, via interface-sets and applying a multi-level class-of-service configuration. As an example: set interfaces interface-set Customer-XYZ interface ge-1/0/5 vlan-tags-outer 725 set class-of-service interfaces interface-set Customer-XYZ output-traffic-control-profile LEVEL_2-svlan_100m set class-of-service interfaces ge-1/0/5 unit 123 output-traffic-control-profile LEVEL_3-cvlan_data-50m **CKT #2** set class-of-service interfaces ge-1/0/5 unit 725 output-traffic-control-profile LEVEL_3-cvlan_data-50m **CKT #1** set class-of-service traffic-control-profiles LEVEL_2-svlan_100m scheduler-map svlan-data-voice set class-of-service traffic-control-profiles LEVEL_2-svlan_100m shaping-rate 100m set class-of-service traffic-control-profiles LEVEL_2-svlan_100m guaranteed-rate 100m set class-of-service traffic-control-profiles LEVEL_3-cvlan_data-50m scheduler-map cvlan-data set class-of-service traffic-control-profiles LEVEL_3-cvlan_data-50m shaping-rate 100m set class-of-service traffic-control-profiles LEVEL_3-cvlan_data-50m guaranteed-rate 50m Trying to translate this type of configuration over to the Cisco ASR 920 has been.... Difficult. I believe the only thing close to the Juniper interface-set is the Cisco 'service-group'. The problem I am having is that the service-group service-policy restrictions are not allowing me to ensure certain traffic (voice) is given priority queue access. Per the ASR documentation, I understand that queuing and marking is not supported at the service-group policy level, but I am hoping to get this to work by having a service-policy on the EFP itself and having the ASR "merge" the two together, as described in the documentation - of course, that is not working as designed either. Here is what I have so far: **setting up the service-group and calling a rather simple class-default policy-map** service-group 1234 description CID-1234 EVC group service-policy output 50Mbps_Egress_Service_Group end Router#show policy-map 50Mbps_Egress_Service_Group Policy Map 50Mbps_Egress_Service_Group Class class-default police cir 50000000 bc 1562500 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0 no ip address load-interval 30 negotiation auto storm-control broadcast level 5.00 4.00 storm-control action shutdown no lldp transmit no lldp receive spanning-tree portfast trunk spanning-tree bpdufilter enable spanning-tree bpduguard enable service instance 30 ethernet description CID-XYZ-Internet encapsulation dot1q 30 rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric group 1234 service-policy output EFP_Egress_Level3 Router#show policy-map EFP_Egress_Level3 Policy EFP_Egress_Level3 Class EGR-EF-CLASS priority Router#show class-map EGR-EF-CLASS Class Map match-all EGR-EF-CLASS (id 4) Description: Matches VoIP EF traffic Match ip dscp ef (46) Once I apply the service-policy in the EFP instance above, I get a console log message stating the following: "Cannot attach queuing-based child policy to a non-queuing based class" So my question is, can anyone point me in the right direction in getting as closed to the desired Juniper solution posted above? Thank you. Sincerely, Steve Margelos -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Atlantech Online, Inc. | http://www.atlantech.net phone: 301-755-2260 | 866-755-2260 fax: 301-589-3936 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- view our Network status | http://noc.atlantech.net _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
