Correct me if I'm wrong, but the LRM SFPs are designed to go over MMF, not SMF. Isn't that going to be a problem?
We're using some LRM SFPs between floors to a 5548, and they function just fine. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Crist J. Clark <cjc+cisco-...@pumpky.net> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:45:58PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> On 14/09/2015 22:39, Crist J. Clark wrote: >> > We are running all of this over SMF. >> >> why are you using LRM transceivers then? > > I am not exactly sure of the design decisions behind the choice to use LRM > over > SMF to orginally connect the distro to the core when the campus was built. But > given that it was working, and we already had almost enough spare LRMs on hand > to complete the project, It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time. > > We also have OM3 MMF between the buildings so replacing this all with SR is > the main plan right now, but whatever the problem is with the LRM modules > looks more like software/firmware than a problem with the fiber paths (the > links > always do eventually come up with good light readings and no errors), and we > were just curious if anyone had seen this issue with 5ks and LRM before and > found a way to deal with it. > -- > Crist J. Clark > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/