Hi Nicolas,
R8 did the conversion from Type7 to type5 LSA because it has the highest RID.
And R1 did not do the conversion because Type7 LSA in question has already been
translated to Type5 LSA.
adam
>
Adam Vitkovsky
IP Engineer
T: 0333 006 5936
E: [email protected]
W: www.gamma.co.uk
This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of
this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which
it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship.
No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it
in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error,
please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our
postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email [email protected]
Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with
limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office
is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at
Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.
-----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Nicolas V
> Sent: 22 September 2015 11:15
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [c-nsp] OSPF totally NSSA and route redistribution
>
> Hi,
>
> I am facing a metric / design problem with a totally NSSA setup.
>
> I have described my problem on cisco forums :
>
> https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12612446/ospf-totally-nssa-
> and-route-redistribution
>
>
> Any clue would be helpful for us to begin to resolve this issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolas
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
