Cheers Nathan...sane logic appears to have alluded the team responsible for some of these choices....
________________________________________ From: Nathan Ward <cisco-...@daork.net> Sent: Saturday, 16 January 2016 8:11 PM To: CiscoNSP List Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh > On 16/01/2016, at 22:03, CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Nathan - I really question Cisco's thought process....what was "wrong" > with the traditional style RJ45 console port? Took up too much realestate?? > > We have rack kits for them, but Ive only just unpacked 2, found the fun > console ports, got that working, and upgraded XE on them both....havent > installed rack kits yet, but thanks for the heads up....can they still be > racked on top of each other, or does the rack kit cause issues? Caused issues for me, yeah. Here’s a pic: http://imgur.com/W8Z2Imi Those folded bits are so it can sit flat when in wall mount mode, but they make it taller than 1RU. Pretty stupid. -- Nathan Ward _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
