On 08/03/16 09:27, James Bensley wrote: > This issue didn't show up in lab testing and we haven't been able to > replicate it (nor have TAC). It seems to be something about the > ordering of patching and that was the point I wanted to highlight but > poorly eluded to. > > A fresh 4.3.4 install then add SP10 and it "just works". This box was > 4.3.4 default, then some SMUs, then SP6 and then SP10 (each upgrade > was suggested by TAC because of a different issue ocuring over the > lifecycle of the box).
Presumably to "prove" this (or rather, to add any evidence at all) it's wipe & reinstall time for the affected 9001? I'm not trying to get your back up here - I'm more concerned about FUD vs. actual, operational experience. XR is not perfect, but this doesn't appear to be a problem affecting anyone other than yourself? -- Tom _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/