Dont think the ASR920 supports netflow "yet"? (Could be wrong, as it was due to support it "soonish")...supported number of VRF instances/VPLS instances etc...the ME3600's certainly had limits in these areas, but Id have to have a dig in the docco's re ASR920's....and supported # of routes differs...ASR1Ks can take a variety of SPA cards, so can support eth, atm etc - http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/qa_c67-452124.html
________________________________________ From: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> on behalf of Satish Patel <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 29 April 2016 2:00 PM To: Cisco Network Service Providers Subject: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs ASR1001-x I was reading specs of ASR920 looks promising and only limitation it can hold 20k routes except that what is the difference between ASR920 and ASR1001-x ? speed? performance? _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
