On 2016-05-03 08:47, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 11:39:47PM +0200, Sebastian Ganschow wrote:
There's a feature request open for this.
The whole "use link-local next-hops for peers where the session is via
a global address" is one of the most stupid ideas in this whole IPv6
thing
anyway. There is no benefit, but a heap of drawbacks (like, instant
black holing if ND fails for the link-local address) - and it's no
wonder
that no other vendor but Cisco does this...
I have a feature request to at least add a knob for "please use GUA
next-hop!" - CSCut26765 - it was opened by a friendly Cisco developer,
and I have no read access to it, so no idea whether it's proceeding or
not. But if you have interest in getting this fixed, please open a
case and link to it...
gert
Sebastian,
Thank you!
Gert,
As far as i can see there are two valid options for that:
1) route-map + disable-connected-check
2) bgp table-map
And on XR (5.3.1) you only need the route-policy.
Why do we need yet another knob?
Regards
--
Marco
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
