Yes - We were going to use /31's for cust eth links, but as Win7 etc dont 
support them, it made testing the links to a Lappy/PC rather difficult, so had 
to stick with wasting 2 IP's and use /30


All our Core p-t-p links are /31s though...saves a heap on IP "wastage"


________________________________
From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Doug McIntyre 
<mer...@geeks.org>
Sent: Saturday, 25 June 2016 2:02 PM
To: Cisco Network Service Providers
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Private IP in point to point link on internet

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:00:18PM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote:
<... other stuff about /31's cut.. >
> Only the two devices need to support it
>
> ASA will not, Cisco IOS/XR/XE will


Since the RFC specifies /31 *only* for WANs, I've found that many
ethernet only things have no support for /31. Only router type products
in my experience.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
cisco-nsp Info Page - 
puck.nether.net<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
puck.nether.net
To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the cisco-nsp 
Archives. Using cisco-nsp: To post a message to all the list members, send ...



archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to