Thanks Mike. There's no existing svclc's on the 6500, so vlan-group 10 is unused. I was mainly concerned that the 6500 would stop switching VLAN101 after it's been assigned to the svclc.
Just wanted to get confirmation on that before I drop all my traffic accidentally :-) On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:20 PM, harbor235 <harbor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Config looks good for the 6500 portion of the config as long as the vlans > you have specified for vlan-group 10 are unused? > I also assume you have created the vlans as well? > > Mike > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Chris Knipe <sav...@savage.za.org> wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> Quick question... I'm about to install my first ACE30 into a 6500 >> (SUP720)... Just a quick question about the svclc if I may... >> >> I already have VLAN101 with all my rservers (currently in production, >> being >> fed from a old LB we'll be replacing with the ACE30). >> >> I created a new VLAN102 which will be used for the customer facing leg of >> the ACE... >> >> Config: >> svclc vlan-group 10 101,102 >> svclc module 1 vlan-group 10 >> svclc multiple-vlan-interfaces >> >> Are those commands safe? I'm not sure whether or not the switch will drop >> traffic to VLAN101 which is currently doing some 2Gbps in traffic. >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > > -- Regards, Chris Knipe _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/