If the card is switching type card then yes it does care and draws from the internal VLAN database. The true routed cards (SPA) are not part of the internal VLAN database. I ran into this on 7600 routers with WS line cards. However the SPA cards in the chassis did not draw from the internal VLAN pool.
On Sep 16, 2016 6:57 AM, "Patrick M. Hausen" <hau...@punkt.de> wrote: > Hi, all, > > I just stumbled into a minor POLA violation here: > (at least I'm astonished ;-) > > > Core1(config-subif)#int gi4/9.100 > Core1(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q 100 > Command rejected: VLAN 100 cannot be allocated. VLANs 1-1005 are VTP VLANs > VTP mode is client or server and must be changed to Transparent/Off to use > VLANs 1-1005 > > Yes, of course. I do have VTP. And a VTP database. Including VLAN 100. > But this is for *switched* ports like so: > > int gi4/... > switchport > switchport access VLAN 100 > > int VLAN100 > ip address ... > > > But *router* ports on the same platform should (IMHO) not care > about all of this. I mean, just create the sub-if and attach a tag to > every packet, will ya? > > > Is there any way to accomplish what I'm trying? Other than moving > the connection in question to a completely different chassis? > > Any hints greatly appreciated. Thanks. > Patrick > -- > punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe > Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100 > i...@punkt.de http://www.punkt.de > Gf: Jürgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285 > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
