Cheers Tim - Yes, I'm liking them a lot...Just tossing up whether the 5000 will 
be adequate, or whether the 5500 is the better option (Larger FIB/more 
features(That I may/may not need...but provides flexibility for the 
future))...quick google on rrp, 5501 was ~double the price of the 5001...hope 
this isnt the case....


Cheers


________________________________
From: Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, 31 December 2016 12:49 AM
To: CiscoNSP List; Phil Bedard; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PE "Sprawl" - P/Core Router suggestions.

I have an NCS-5501 in the lab (SE unit, non-SE not available for demo.) Working 
OSPF, MPLS, MP-BGP, L3VPN etc. No production experience yet.

I am looking at the NCS-5501 for a high performance dense 10G P/PE (no CE 
involved.) Looking at NCS-5502 for dense 100G P.

I think the NCS-5500 platform is attractive. Reminds me of the C6K/C7.6K but 
running IOS-XR.

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 7:16 PM CiscoNSP List 
<cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com<mailto:cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Phil - We currently run MPLS/OSPF/BGP...predominantly selling L3VPN services 
(And also vanilla Inet) - No intention of running user services on the new 
core, all will be on the PE's...The 5501 does look very nice...havent seen 
pricing on them yet...ball park "double" the price of the 5001?


Im hoping someone on the list has used (Or is using) the 5000/5500 - As they 
are very new, stability is a concern - Cheers


________________________________
From: Phil Bedard <phil...@gmail.com<mailto:phil...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, 30 December 2016 1:19 AM
To: CiscoNSP List; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PE "Sprawl" - P/Core Router suggestions.

What kind of protocols are you running on the network?  What’s the likelihood 
of running some user services or more advanced features on the new “core” 
boxes?   Cisco gear the NCS 5501 would probably be my choice, it’s 
substantially less expensive than the 5502 if you don’t need the 100G density 
or still need to support 1G.  The low scale version of the box would probably 
fit your needs fine, and they’ve made enhancements in 6.1.2 where the low scale 
versions can fit an Internet table now if need be.   On the lower end that’s a 
bit tougher but the price point on the 5501 may be low enough it makes sense to 
use it everywhere.

Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp 
<cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
on behalf of CiscoNSP List 
<cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com<mailto:cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 23:04
To: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>" 
<cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [c-nsp] PE "Sprawl" - P/Core Router suggestions.

    Hi Everyone (Apologies in advance for the long post :) )


    We have multiple POPs, of varying sizes, no true "core"....due to size 
initially(# of customer tails @ POPs), collapsed design was used to reduce 
capex/improve ROI.


    Hardware currently used are ME3600's/ASR920's/ASR1Ks(LNS/Transit), and TOR 
switches 4900's, Nex3Ks


    Primary service offering is L3VPN, and as we aggregate with a large number 
of carriers, customers can pick/choose tails to suit budget/bandwidth/sla's etc


    Interpop connections are currently going into our ASR920's, and as they 
have a limited # of 10G ports(4), we are having to add more ASR920's, purely 
for 10G...not ideal, not scaleable, and increasingly difficult to manage.


    So, looking to put a more modular(Hierarchical two-layer - "core" and 
"aggregation" ) design in place, that is easily replicable/templated/flexible.


    Hardware (Cisco house) - Ive looked at so far:


    ASR9001 for our larger POPs, but 10G port density on them is an issue...4 
onboard, and they only support the 4 port 10G MPAs(2 line card slots, so 2 of 
these)....so total 12 x 10G?
    ASR1K - I see they have released the 1001/2-HX with the 1002 having an EPA 
slot - So, 8 x 10G onboard, and with an EPA 10x10G a total of 18 x 10G ports - 
but as these are very very new, Im guessing very pricey?
    NCS - Very new, and know very little about them - NCS5001/NCS5002 - 10G 
port density definitely not an issue(40 + 80)...but they are an "MPLS agg 
router"...So, potentially an option if we went BGP-free "core"?
    Then we have the bigger "chassis" brothers of the ASR9K/1K and NCS...all 
being a lot more $, and taking up a lot more real-estate in the Rack..

    ASR9001 - "looked" like an ideal candidate, but the limited number of 10G 
ports is an issue
    ASR1K - 1002-HX - Looks fantastic, but I would imagine very big $ if fully 
populated with 10G ports
    NCS - Unsure on these as they are very new, and docs on them are a little 
sparse...i.e. Could they be an option, if we went BGP-free in the core?
    Other Options?


    Then for our smaller pops (that have 2-4 ASR920's(PEs) - Core/Agg box for 
these is quite a challenge...we would still need something with 10x10G ports to 
give us scale(PEs) and also for Interpop....any suggestions here would be 
greatly appreciated :)


    For our "larger" POPs, where we will see 6+ (ASR920's) PEs - Dual 10G 
connectivity to the 2 Core/Agg routers will quickly burn lots of ports (As well 
as the needed Interpop connections) - Are mini PE "rings" an option...i.e. 
maybe 4 x ASR920's, east-west connected, with just 2 having 10G to the core/Agg?


    Appreciate any suggestions/comments/recommendations  - Cheers


    _______________________________________________
    cisco-nsp mailing list  
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
cisco-nsp Info Page - 
puck.nether.net<http://puck.nether.net><https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
puck.nether.net<http://puck.nether.net>
cisco-nsp -- list for people using cisco in a NSP (Network service provider) 
environment About cisco-nsp



    archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to