There are implementations of this using eBGP, mainly in datacenters, but you 
could maybe do the same thing with iBGP, NH manipulation, and RR.  There was at 
least one router vendor I encountered in the past that required a BGP-LU route 
be resolved using some underlying tunnel type like RSVP/LDP, with eBGP it 
automatically associated the peer interface as the NH forwarding interface.  
Not sure how Cisco behaves in those scenarios.   

The configuration as someone else mentioned would likely be overly complicated 
and hard for most to follow once you figure it all out initially.  ☺ 

Phil 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Alireza 
Soltanian <soltan...@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 04:44
To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Subject: [c-nsp] iBGP as MPLS labeling protocol

    Hi Everybody
    
    I know this seems stupid, but I want to know is it possible to use ibgp as
    labeling protocol inside of an AS. A scenario which I have in my mind is
    establishing L2VPN connection between two PE routers while Network between
    PE routers uses iBGP(ipv4 afi/safi)?
    
    Is there anybody here who saw such implementation? I searched the Internet
    and everything I found is about Inter-AS.
    
     
    
    Thank you for your help and support
    
    Alireza
    
    _______________________________________________
    cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
    archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
    


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to