On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Bryan Holloway <br...@shout.net> wrote: > > Imagine an ABR bordering areas 0 and 1 which is summarizing 10.0.0.0/8 > > to the backbone.> > > >> Downstream is a router running OSPF with the ABR. On that router is a > > static route to yet another device that does not support OSPF. Let's >> say that static route is 10.100.0.0/24. > > Am I correct in understanding the redistribution is in area 1? > > If so, this link may help: https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/102826 > > The idea is to turn area 1 into an NSSA area, so the static would be a type 7, and you could then drop the type 5 LSAs on the ABR.
> The idea is cool, but I am not sure whether I would really want this in production. > > BGP instead of areas anyone? Ospf reacts much faster than bgp, iff you have some sort of redundancy/backup line. You may also want to inject default into the totally-stubby-not-so-stubby area, And implement some sort of prefix filtering on both sides. Just my 0.01$ Juergen. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
