Hi James - Yes I tested this also....it still will not go above 50%...at first I though it may be the carriers link, but I also tested the bidirectional/simultaneous test, and it produced similar results (Single direction test were fine.) Single direction tests are fine.
I think its a problem with IPerf, potentiallly the server nics...Or maybe IPerf is "limited" to the bandwith of the link (1G, but can only send/receive a "total" (50% in both directions) There are a few reports of issues with the bidirectional tests, but I cant locate any "fixes".....so Id prefer to spend time looking at a more robust (proven) testing tool. Cheers ________________________________ From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, 9 August 2017 5:47 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative On 9 August 2017 at 08:39, CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Ryan - They did not include bidirectional simultaneous test in V3 I > dont think? (this is a test we definitely require, and one that is causing us > the most issues in v2 (It appears to be somewhat broken...perhaps that is > what they dint include it in v3 ? Run two copies simultaneously? That way you can also tweak the two unidirectional streams independently. Cheers, James. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp cisco-nsp Info Page - puck.nether.net<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> puck.nether.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the cisco-nsp Archives. Using cisco-nsp: To post a message to all the list members, send ... archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
