HI Divo, We use asr1ks with rp2s for this type of service without any issues .
One thing you can't do is aggregate shaping on 2 service vlans so you can't have one shaper for 2 sub ints when using pppoe So interface GigabitEthernet1/0/0.1 encapsulation dot1q 100 second-dot1q any and interface GigabitEthernet1/0/0.2 encapsulation dot1q 101 second-dot1q any cannot share an aggregate shaper. Also worth a note is that if you expect more 10g ports the asr9k may be a better fit. Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > Divo Zito > Sent: mercoledì 27 settembre 2017 14:56 > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X BRAS/BNG and shaping via RADIUS CoA > > Hello, > > I need to buy a new BRAS/BNG to terminate about 10K PPPoEoQinQ dual- > stacked users. > > I've found a platform that looks fine, ASR1002-X with SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 cards, > but I wonder if it is able to handle my traffic shaping needs. > > I'll use 802.1q double tagged ambiguous interfaces: > > interface GigabitEthernet1/0/0.1 > encapsulation dot1q 100 second-dot1q any > > I need to perform users downstream shaping both in terms of outer VLAN > aggregate traffic and also on a per-user basis; moreover, I need to be able to > modify user policies on the fly, without disconnecting PPP sessions, that is > using RADIUS Change of Authorization (CoA). > > Anyone is using this configuration and can confirm it works on ASR1002-X? > > Contrarily, any hint on what product may meet my needs is very welcome > (also not strictly Cisco!) > > Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/