On 19 October 2017 at 08:46, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:21:27AM +0100, James Bensley wrote: >> >> Then configure STP for VLAN "10". It doesn't seem like there is any way >> >> to map to an arbitrary PVST instance, VLAN ID and bridge domain ID has >> >> to match. >> >> I don't know the answer to you question but Peter's suggestion sounds >> like a probably answer to me. > > I wasn't particularily asking for suggestions, but for "I have this > working, and this is how it looks like". > > This box is unlike any other Cisco "switch-like thing" I've had in my > hands before, so it might very well be just not supported at all. > >> However, you didn't share you STP >> config, or was "l2protocol peer stp" all of it? :) > > There isn't anything else you *can* configure (except changing the > global STP mode from pvstp to mst and back, and setup mst instances, > which does not have an effecit either). > > So indeed, that's all there is, and the ASR920 MST/PVST+ documentation > claims "there is nothing else you can do". > > *If* you have a vlan, you can do "spanning-tree vlan 10", but that is > default anyway (= not showing up in the config), but since there is no > "vlan 10" in the system, there's no spanning-tree instance for it either > ("show vlans" comes up empty). >
Open a TAC case, they'll probably tell you STP isn't supported and the documentation is infact wrong, that is what has happened for me recently with some ASR920s and ME3600s with a different feature than STP :D Cheers, James. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/