I opened a TAC Case on this: TAC Responded.... We have asked the BU to tell us 
how to do this. So no I am waiting for a Conference call with the BU.

So in the mean time I tried what James said.... I do have my reservations about 
golden disk. In my opinion golden disk is usefully for deploying a new router 
not upgrading a working router, due to the fact you have to generate a new ISO 
for each router. I was able to do this and have the package added to the 
repository.


When I try to add one or more packages to the repo I get the file is corrupt, 
even though the file check sum matches...

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:CR1.LAB1#sh install log 58
Fri Apr 13 09:41:48.156 UTC
Apr 12 12:21:52 Install operation 58 started by esundberg:
 install add source harddisk:/downloads/6.3.2 
asr9k-ospf-x64-1.0.0.0-r632.x86_64.rpm
Apr 12 12:21:53 Action 1: install add action started
Apr 12 12:21:54 Install operation will continue in the background
Apr 12 12:21:55 ERROR! Package "asr9k-ospf-x64-1.0.0.0-r632.x86_64.rpm" is 
invalid: asr9k-ospf-x64-1.0.0.0-r632.x86_64.rpm is corrupt
Apr 12 12:21:55 ERROR!! failed while handling validate reply

Apr 12 12:21:57 Install operation 58 aborted
Apr 12 12:21:57 Ending operation 58

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:CR1.LAB1#



Erik Sundberg
Sr. Network Engineering
Network Engineering Department
p: 773.661.5532
c: 708.710.7419
e: esundb...@nitelusa.com
Main: 888.450.2100
NOC 24/7: 866.892.0915
350 North Orleans Street, Suite 1300N Chicago, IL 60654
www.nitelusa.com

Managed Telecom Services
MPLS | Ethernet | Private Line | Internet | Voice | Security

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
adamv0...@netconsultings.com
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 9:36 AM
To: 'Tom Hill' <t...@ninjabadger.net>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR99xx 64-bit upgrade 6.3.1 to 6.3.2

> Tom Hill
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 1:46 PM
>
> On 12/04/18 18:06, Gert Doering wrote:
> > yum update
> >
> > ... now *that* would be nice...
>
> I thought you could do that...
>
>  https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/assets/global/DK/seminarer/pdfs/XR60.pdf
>  (pgs. 30 & 31)
>
Page 26 of the same doc:
IOS XR  packages  are  installed  with  "install  update/upgrade".
Install  commands  are  a  wrapper  around  YUM  to  provide  multiarch support.
-so there's your yum update

But from the initial discussions on this from a few years back I thought I'd be 
able to spin up container on new version and then just switch to new one in an 
instance, or failback quickly if needed, preferably 0 packet loss in the 
process (maybe I'm mistaken ncs6k with asr9k).
Makes me wonder what's going on under the hood on asr9ks ncs5ks actually -i.e. 
how does the picture look like at each LC (I guess we'll need to wait till this 
"modular" architecture arrives to LCs as well?) In this sense, to me the router 
chassis is like a small DC with compute nodes (in form of RPs and LCs) all 
connected via Ethernet network -it would be nice to have control over which 
containers and what versions run on each compute node.
And regarding the 0 packet loss,
I'm wondering whether the NPU microcode version is independent of the (I guess 
Admin Plane) version (or whether it's still monolithic)

Also wondering when we'll be able to take RPs out of the chassis that is spin 
up the Control container(s) (and third party containers) on COTS HW and let 
these talk to LCs.
As unfortunately these chassis-based systems can become full with just couple 
of LCs in them just because the RP can't cope with the high number of VRFs, 
prefixes and BGP sessions.

adam

netconsultings.com
::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry::

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or 
previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information 
that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the 
information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY 
PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the 
sender immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the original 
transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank 
you.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to