On 13/Oct/18 22:41, Tim Warnock wrote: > We match incoming routes tagged with RTBH from the RR and rewrite to the > appropriate next-hop "/dev/null" by address family, which it sounds a lot > like what you guys do. > > I would consider this to be "policy". Why would you not? We do the above on peering routers. On edge routers, it's not necessary, as the application of the RTBH communities is a local action (which is where it would start from, anyway, if you look at the overall network). Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... James Bensley
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Tim Warnock
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Gert Doering
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Nick Hilliard
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Nick Hilliard
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB prog... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] BGP DFZ convergence time - FIB programming Mark Tinka