Thanks nick, Awesome! I used nfsen in past but it was kind of slow
Do you think 60Gbps traffic nfsen can handle easily ? Could you provide your hardware spec where you running Nfsen ? Ntopng is one more tool but not sure about performance. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 20, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com> wrote: > > We use sflow on 9300's, no performance hit - but you cannot use span sessions > at the same time. > > Newer code revisions support netflow, without the SPAN session limitation, > although we have not tried netflow on the 9300 yet. > > For a collector We use NFSEN - opensource, and quite a big install base, and > it seems to handle a lot of flows. > > It supports sflow and netflow as we have a mix, just make sure you add the > sflow option at build time as it’s a bit funky old linux to add it after. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Satish Patel > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:21 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance > > This message originates from outside of your organisation. > > Folks, > > I have L3 Nexus 9300 switch which is running 60Gbps traffic on ISP interface > so I’m planning to run sflow on that specific interference to get flow. > > Does it going to create any performances issue on switch? > > Can I run sflow on Layer 3 LACP interface? > > Can anyone suggest free open source sflow collector? > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/