On 28/Oct/19 16:57, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > Because I wanted an unbiased field tested recommendation. And that's great, but as you continue to operate your network, you won't be able to run away from working with the vendors at some point or other. Building that experience will quickly teach you how to sniff the snake oil they try to feed you, so they don't waste your time when you engage them. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as... Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as... Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as... Tom Hill
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as... Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as... Tom Hill
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as a B... Patrick M. Hausen
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as a BGP router? James Jun
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as a BGP route... Łukasz Bromirski
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as a BGP router? Łukasz Bromirski