Have you tried adding peering rt rd to the default vrf, and vice versa? On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 7:37 AM Bryan Holloway <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've been attempting to lab up an ASR9001 running 5.3.4 for a PoC > scenario of routing between two internal VRFs: "default" and "peering". > You can probably guess the use-case. > > While I've been successful in getting each VRF to talk to the things > that particular VRF should talk to, getting the two VRFs to talk amongst > themselves has been challenging. > > Installing specific static routes between the two VRFs works, but it > doesn't scale. > > After turning the Google- and Cisco-cranks several times, I get the > impression that yes: it's possible, and no: maybe not. > > I'm not necessarily looking for a HOWTO (although I'm not going to > object to one) ... I'm more curious if anyone has made this work and if > I'm barking up the right tree. At least one article I read suggests that > I need later firmware to do what I want. > > In essence, I think the final piece is to get an IGP (or iBGP) up and > running between the two VRFs so that when I bring up a new customer in > "default", that things in "peering" can see said customer, and vice versa. > > Any input on-line or off- would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!! > > - bryan > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
