On 23/Jul/20 10:28, Chris Jones wrote: > That’s the approach we took, with the SSM box part of the IGP so it’s > reachable.
Yep, exactly. Same view. We are getting rid of a lot of Cisco gear, but for our CSR1000v RR's, I'll incur the hassle, as I'm happy with those. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
