On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 17:19, Mark Smith <markrefres...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for comments. This is very valuable info. What are your thoughts about: > flow udp default rate 0 > flow tcp default rate 0 > > Are they safe to use? Cisco did not recommend them but I dont understand why. > And they failed to explain. Maybe because they dont understand themselves > either As LPTS is never going to be particularly safe for attackers but mostly will work for accidental congestion I would personally not change anything, until you have realised risk, at least then I will have some confidence that the change improves availability. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
