On 12/21/21 09:26, James Bensley wrote:

Hi Drikus,

Did you ever resolve this?

We saw issues with MAC addresses on NCS55K too, but not related to EVPN.

For example, one can use the commands 'interface foo; mac xxxx.xxxx.xxxx" to 
set a custom MAC on a physical interface, XR commits the config but on these 
Broadcom chips it doesn't actually do anything. CLI output shows the custom MAC but 
a packet capture shows the BIA.

We had another issue with the MAC address of CDP/LLDP frames addresses on 
bundle interface (I can't remember the exact details right now, but I think the 
source MAC address of these frames sometimes had the logical bundle MAC and 
sometimes had the member link MAC, and it was inconsistent).

So it seems these chips have issues with MAC address consistency. I'm wondering 
if there is some relation to what you are seeing.

The joys of merchant silicon - completely unpredictable; especially on platforms that you are used to being so.

Given the rising(?) cost of hardware, and the declining revenue from customers, merchant silicon is only going to become more and more relevant. We can't still be playing these games at this stage in the game.

I have lowered my guard, a little, and am now willing to test some boxes from traditional vendors (Juniper + Nokia) that are shipping on the back of Broadcom J2 chips. But I've already had to dump Nokia because they say they won't support a chip-restricted feature which Juniper claim they will.

I don't know who's lying, or telling the half-truth.

So much confusion, in this space.

Mark.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to