Folks:

I'm hoping someone can share their experience with the Cisco recommended method 
for removing EWS limits on Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4 and higher. In earlier 
releases of Ex2010 the process of setting a throttling policy applied only to 
the UM service account, and any throttling performed would be applied to that 
service account and not to the target mailbox. Please correct me if my 
understanding is incorrect, but with E2010 SP2 RU4 and higher, the policy is to 
be applied to every target mailbox, which seems like it would impact all other 
EWS applications impersonating these target mailboxes.
Removing EWS Limits from Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4 and Later
Microsoft has enabled the client throttling policy feature by default. If there 
is no throttling policy already configured, Microsoft Exchange applies a 
default policy to all users. The default throttling policy is tailored for end 
user's load and not for an enterprise application like, Cisco Unity Connection 
using impersonation. If any Cisco Unity Connection users who are configured for 
unified messaging have mailboxes in Exchange 2010, configure the Exchange 2010 
EWS limits for the unified messaging users mailbox by creating and applying a 
new mailbox policy to the unified messaging user mailbox account. If you do not 
configure EWS limits, messages may not be synchronized, and status changes (for 
example, from unread to read), changes to the subject line, and changes to the 
priority may not be replicated. In addition, attempts to access Exchange 
calendars and contacts may fail.

The MS KB referring to the throttling policy change: 
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2713371

Perhaps my understanding is wrong, but it seems like a backwards move. Has 
anyone seen any adverse effects of applying the Cisco recommended throttling 
values as the system default? Perhaps any problems where applying the 
throttling policy to the target mailbox impacts other EWS apps like BlackBerry 
Enterprise? Are you applying the throttling policy for every single UM enabled 
mailbox, individually, via management shell?

Thanks!

- Dan


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to