I’ll lead off with: UCCX does a fair amount of work to customize the VOS 
platform to their needs. As such they don’t pull in updates and fixes as fast 
as UCM, UC, and CUP.

I bet if you check the kernel or RHEL version you will find significant 
difference and that contributes to the complexity of the fix.
admin:show packages active kernel
Active Side Package(s): for kernel package(s)
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.noarch
kernel-2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64
platform-kernel-tunable-1.0.0.0-1.i386
dracut-kernel-004-336.el6_5.1.noarch

RyanL may weigh in with better details.

-w

On Jul 10, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Charles Goldsmith 
<wo...@justfamily.org<mailto:wo...@justfamily.org>> wrote:

I understand that CUCM and UCCX are both VOS, and that it's probably not the 
same version, but I don't understand why the platform team for CUCM can give us 
a minor patch but we can't get the same out of UCCX.

I'm sure most of you are like me, and steer clear of .0 releases.  There is an 
old saying, dot Oh, oh no.

I'm not comfortable advising a customer to upgrade to the 11.0 release.

Would like thoughts on this, and some explanation of the differences of the VOS 
between CUCM/CUC and UCCX.

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to