Spot on Dennis. Next thing to kill off is voicemail. :) would rather have a call just be transcribed to email, a IM, or sparked instead of a wav file left. I know speech view can do the transcription.
On Wednesday, December 9, 2015, Heim, Dennis <dennis.h...@wwt.com> wrote: > Since I have been doing this for 10+ years, it seems that all the complex > telephony features become less and less important. It seems that a single > line per user is “good enough.” Lync has been pushing a good enough mantra > for some time. I think for most users the call coverage of ring my phone, > and other devices then go to voicemail. > > > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net');>] *On > Behalf Of *Lelio Fulgenzi > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 08, 2015 5:29 PM > *To:* Brian Meade <bmead...@vt.edu > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bmead...@vt.edu');>> > *Cc:* cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip@puck.nether.net');>> > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Collab summit keynote simulcast on now... > > > > > > Key point is traditional. Cisco has said on more than one occasion > (officially or unofficially) that feature parity with the pbx is no longer > their focus. I twitch a little less each time someone mentions forwarding > non-primary lines (sorry Ed and Scott, you'll need to find new > entertainment) as time goes on. > > > > Just a cell phone companies have trained us into thinking cell coverage > and clarity is "good enough", we'll find that with features going forward. > > > > It certainly seems like they've put a lot of thought into it this time > around. Very little had me scratching my head saying why. > > > > Well, except for the fact that I couldn't watch on my iPad! Ugh! Apple > this. Apple that. Mobile device this. Mobile device that. Look what we can > do. > > > > The price point was interesting as well. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Dec 8, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Brian Meade <bmead...@vt.edu > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bmead...@vt.edu');>> wrote: > > What did everyone think? Seems fairly polished but I'm sure definitely > missing a ton of traditional telephony features. > > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) < > akram...@cisco.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','akram...@cisco.com');>> > wrote: > > https://communities.cisco.com/community/technology/collaboration/collaborat > ion_virtual_experience > > > On 08/12/15, 10:38 PM, "cisco-voip on behalf of Lelio Fulgenzi" > > <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net');> on > behalf of le...@uoguelph.ca > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','le...@uoguelph.ca');>> wrote: > > > > >Head on over to the collab user group pages for a link to the simulcast. > > > >Sent from my iPhone > >_______________________________________________ > >cisco-voip mailing list > >cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip@puck.nether.net');> > >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip@puck.nether.net');> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip