Ben, you can glean this info via CDR if you archive those, but not an easy task. Variphy has a report to pull this type of info from CDR and is quite handy.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Ben Amick <bam...@humanarc.com> wrote: > So is there any solution for pre-12 instances for this scenario? > Specifically, 9.X. > > > > (That said, there’s some nifty features in v12, notably the message > archiving enforcement that will be very helpful to my org) > > > > Ben Amick > > Unified Communications Analyst > > > > *From:* Matthew Loraditch [mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 12, 2017 12:07 PM > *To:* Ben Amick <bam...@humanarc.com>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* RE: Inactive Device Query? > > > > https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/ > rel_notes/12_0_1/cucm_b_release-notes-for-cucm-imp- > 1201/cucm_b_release-notes-for-cucm-imp-1201_chapter_00.html > > > > Scroll to this section: > > New Columns to Manage Devices Efficiently > > > > > > Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA > Network Engineer > Direct Voice: 443.541.1518 <(443)%20541-1518> > [image: Email_Sig_Template_H_shortcopy_UPDATED] > > Facebook > <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/k-Kr3x8Sy_tZdBdxyVKVJ55BZBcsehd79J55BZBcsY-Orhhpvuv7ffK6Qkn3hOqerTKzsSgRmlyEa9JGX3oSVsSjrlS6NJOVIsOVtUwqen-LObMUsCOUVRXBQSm4uphu76zBdN_G8FHnjlKC_OEuvkzaT0QSyrvdTVdWUVBAQsIfTdTdAVPmEBC5etSTAaRaYLxfPVlxfX4Okvte9DCRjWNR2kX4MkjY-loj-Ne5jWApvjBPqqb9EVjdwIqid40r3rjApYQg1TCpmYQg0eTYiN8SCUrW7EB_X22fW0z> > | Twitter > <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsS720wrhvK-COCMNsTsSyyO-OCe78CzASyyO-OCeuvpdEEILLfzDDT3qabxEVd7dXThKr8qHaNk54SRtxIrsKr9JGX3oSVsSepsKYgd7b_nV5UsejpssWZOWrb2fcEL3zhOCU_R4kRHFGTjvVkffGhBrwqrjdLCXYCZssOOqem7XCXCOsVHkiP9C9jDYunMb-vaI0jZypJk-ItgBeNc54_fBm4_Ijxk-F6nQVsSCyOqekPob6Azh06MSQV6vd40tVClLd403J_4IidFK6-LcV0kM-0aB> > | LinkedIn > <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsS92hJ5-XWrar35PtPqabbXaoUsyqejqabbXaoVVZASyyO-Y-euvsdEEK6zAQsTLt6VIxGIH5gkjrlS6NJOVICSHIdzrBPoVBOXN0QsLZvAnxMVdBNPHTbFII8YOyYed7arz_khjmKCHtd_BgY-F6lK1FJAS-rLOrRNPb9EVovKrKr9PCJhbcasva1nQ9gVv5RJwmMDVYGMbP-Ne5jWApvgBe9kWtlxm6ChkDlnPqFZoWxatyoa9-vaI9_oD2FZicLFOVJd5AQsFCMmd96y0dxJFOc-q80XPcHuq807r-9oArjsdARtndHh-RNMW> > | G+ > <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/avndy0w738OrhvK-COCMNsTsSyyO-OCe78CzASyyO-OCeuvpdEEILLfzDDT3qabxEVd7dXThKr8qHaNk54SRtxIrsKr9JGX3oSVsSepsKYgd7b_nV5UsejpssWZOWrb2fcEL3zhOCU_R4kRHFGTjvVkffGhBrwqrodLCXYCZssOOqem7XCXCOsVHkiP5zSWshHkyv_bUQ1z3882_DOH2vS9MGvkzbWoJmAW6RjWNR2kX4MkjY-loj-Ne5jWApvjBPqqb9EVjdwIqid40r3rjApYQg1TCpmYQg0eTYiN8SCUrf6Dk> > > > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net > <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>] *On Behalf Of *Ben Amick > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:56 AM > *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Inactive Device Query? > > > > I haven’t seen it mentioned before, but I feel like it’s a common thing to > go through an audit old phones in the environment, but other than looking > through lists of terminated users and cross referencing active users, I > can’t think of any good way to audit phones to see if they’re alive > anymore, especially with softphones. > > > > In AD I would just pull a report with powershell of users/computers not > logged in for >90 days, is there any comparable option in CUCM for inactive > phones that you could audit against? Like last registration date or some > such? > > > > Ben Amick > > Unified Communications Analyst > > > > > Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the > individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information > that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under > applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient > or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If > you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or > hard copy. Thank you > > Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the > individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information > that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under > applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient > or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If > you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or > hard copy. Thank you > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip