OK. Thanks. To be clear, by “administrators” I meant : a limited number of trusted users meant to access the machine, not necessarily those with administrator privileges.
This is helping me build my plan. Thanks so much everyone. I’m also reading the advisories over and over again to try to make them stick. From: https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180104-cpusidechannel This explains it well… To exploit any of these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be able to run crafted code on an affected device. Although the underlying CPU and operating system combination in a product may be affected by these vulnerabilities, the majority of Cisco products are closed systems that do not allow customers to run custom code on the device, and thus are not vulnerable. There is no vector to exploit them. Cisco devices are considered potentially vulnerable only if they allow customers to execute their customized code side-by-side with Cisco code on the same microprocessor. But then the next paragraph confuses me… A Cisco product that may be deployed as a virtual machine or a container, even while not being directly affected by any of these vulnerabilities, could be targeted by such attacks if the hosting environment is vulnerable. Cisco recommends customers harden their virtual environment and ensure that all security updates are installed. So it’s not just that an ESXi host would be vulnerable, but all the apps running on it too? Yeesh. This is a big mess. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] From: Ben Amick [mailto:bam...@humanarc.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:48 AM To: Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca>; Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <rratl...@cisco.com> Cc: voip puck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Spectre and Meltdown remediation as relevant to Cisco systems Proper access control is always important and will theoretically mitigate many an issue. I believe your answer would be nearly accurate except that Windows allows customized code to run without administrative access. You can run a batch file, a powershell script, etc. which could enable vulnerability to the attack vector. I even believe one of the two vulnerabilities can be accessed through a java script in your web browser on windows. CUCM and such do not have this limitation as without root access you cannot run anything that is not already allocated inside of the CUCM UI or shell, thereby allowing no customized code to ever run. Ben Amick Unified Communications Analyst From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:42 AM To: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <rratl...@cisco.com<mailto:rratl...@cisco.com>> Cc: voip puck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Spectre and Meltdown remediation as relevant to Cisco systems OK – Just so I’m clear why the baremetal UCOS version isn’t vulnerable… Is it because this is a “local attack” ? And needs someone to login to the shell? https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=56354 : CPU hardware contains multiple vulnerabilities that could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code with user privileges and gain access to sensitive information on a targeted system. If we were to assume that no one could log into the Window shell other than administrators, would that also be safe? Sorry, silly questions, I know. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsS86QnQnTPhOYqen6jtPqabbXaoUsyqejqabbXaoVVZASyyO-Y-euvsdEEK6zAQsTLt6VIxGIH5gkjrlS6NJOVICSHIdzrBPqoVxBN_n-LOpEVud7dTbzKLsKCOe7sMqekhPzaavkhjmKCHuXDaxVZicHs3jq9JUTvHEFFICzCWtPhOrKr01dR8J-uIjWSVqR3tFkJkKpH9oKgGT2TQ1iPtyL0QDYu1FJxeX1EVdwLQzh0qmXiFqFsPmiNFtd40MJZFNYQgr10Qg3vDPgGowq88-HW4JDaI3h1J3h17P_cX2pEwDkQg2kGmGq8a5GjZmxIsYrI6jA> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline] From: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) [mailto:rratl...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 9:11 AM To: Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> Cc: voip puck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Spectre and Meltdown remediation as relevant to Cisco systems The only baremetal versions of those products that would require a patch are the ones that ran on Windows. Since we moved to linux root has been locked down and you can’t run custom code on the box, which is a requirement for exploitation of this vulnerability. -Ryan On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:58 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: I'm wondering if products like CUCM v9 and UCCx v9 will be investigated/patched for vulnerabilities? Especially since they're bare metal compatible. If Linux is affected, then wouldn't these be as well? We're in the process of migrating but it would be good to know. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 9, 2018, at 8:32 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: To be honest, I'm a little worried about the rumoured slowdown the fixes are gonna have. Will this impact the supported status of certain CPUs in collab suite? Sent from my iPhone On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: Good question. I’m not sure of the impact either. I _suspect_ that because ESXi abstracts the CPU that the intel CPU bug would affect ESXi only, not the underlying applications. Because you can’t run the software on baremetal any longer, there shouldn’t be a need to update the voice applications. I’m also guessing that CIMC would likely need some updates too. But yes, interesting to see how this plays out. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/5fHCN0q6hASy-y--qenzhOUOrKrhhpvpj73AjhOrhhpvpj7ffICQkmnTDNPPXxJ55MQsCzCZXETdAdlBoG2yrqKMSdKndASRtxIrsKrj7ccKfW_R-jd7bNEVKVstRXBQShMXC3hOyesphjWyaqRQRrTsVkffGhBrwqrjdL6XZt5ddAQsTjKqejtPo09KF5LPRyvmTbmErJaBGBPdpb5O5mUm-wamrIlU6A_zMddI9Tod79I5-Aq83iTqlblbCqOmdbFEw65LJefCy3o86y0rY-q5j43h17RvgBIVlwq8dEq88-vVDojd44WCy0iBiRjh1gJivGQdzDztj549NxV> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook <image001.png> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben Amick Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 4:27 PM To: voip puck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Spectre and Meltdown remediation as relevant to Cisco systems So I haven’t had much time to look into this, but has anyone else compiled a list of or needs for remediation for cisco systems for the Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities? I know the one only affects Intel and some ARM processors, whereas the other is more OS level, if I understand properly? So being that all the cisco telephony products are on virtualized product now, I assume that we would go to VMWare for any patching relevant to those, but I would imagine that we would also need a security patch for the redhat/centos OS the Unified Communications products run on (and doubly so for those of us using old MCS physical chassis?) It looks like routers and switches, as well as ASAs are all potentially vulnerable as well. I’ve found the following articles on their website: https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=56354 and https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180104-cpusidechannel that details the issues a bit, but it looks like Cisco hasn’t found anything yet nor delivered any patches? Ben Amick Unified Communications Analyst Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/5fHCN8g43qbWbXVEVud7bz9KVJ55BZBcsehd79J55BZBcsY-Orhhpvuv7ffK6Qkn3hOqerTKzsSgRmlyEa9JGX3oSVsSjrlS6NJOVJcsMOU_H_nVcQsL6zCXBNTnKnjp73Kod7a8VNB5fG8FHnjlLtPBgY-F6lK1FJASYrLRQkQSjhPteVEVdTdAVPmEBCbdSaY3ivNU6U9GX33VkDa3JsJaBGBPdpb6XiFqFsPmiNsxlK5LE2BCX5u1FfUY3jr2tS3hOr1vF6y0QJSBiRiVCIBziWq81xrXjzVEwS21Ew6_fCxkN0QghZnQ9relo6y3q6y2fD-pS4Ph1eFEw4FkJkQgkbkDWJ3oVUS9Iw> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIi6x0i6jqbWbXVEVud7bz9KVJ55BZBcsehd79J55BZBcsY-Orhhpvuv7ffK6Qkn3hOqerTKzsSgRmlyEa9JGX3oSVsSjrlS6NJOVJcsMOU_H_nVcQsL6zCXBNTnKnjp73Kod7a8VNB5fG8FHnjlLtPBgY-F6lK1FJwSYrLRQkQSjhPteVEVdTdAVPmEBCbdSaY3ivNU6U9GX33VkDa3JsJaBGBPdpb6XiFqFsPmiNsxlK5LE2BCX5u1FfUY3jr2tS3hOr1vF6y0QJSBiRiVCIBziWq81xrXjzVEwS21Ew6_fCxkN0QghZnQ9relo6y3q6y2fD-pS4Ph1eFEw4FkJkQgkbkDWJ3oVUTCeCd-uK_fVX> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/2DRPoO76QnQnTPhOYqen6jtPqabbXaoUsyqejqabbXaoVVZASyyO-Y-euvsdEEK6zAQsTLt6VIxGIH5gkjrlS6NJOVICSHIdzrBPqoVxBN_n-LOpEVud7dTbzKLsKCOe7sMqekhPzaavkhjmKCHuXDaxVZicHs3jrVJUTvHEFFICzCWtPhOrKr9PCJhbcmrIlU6A_zMdMjlS67OFek7qVqlblbCqOmdSBiRiVCIByV2Hsbvg5bdSaY3ivNU6CS4XI6zAS2_id41FrJaBGBPdpb6BQQg32TSD7Ph1I43h0d-vd2Fy1EwzWLEiSsGMd46Qd44vfYPI9Cy2tjh09iFqFEwEmFfRq6NPNJge8> Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
