algue tem sala pra disca numeros pra ganha dinheiro? Em sex., 21 de mai. de 2021 às 15:59, Dave Wolgast <dwolg...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> My question was about: > • Calling Party Mask = XXXXXXXXXX > > You said further down that you were sending 01509XXXXXX but it wasn't > being reflected in DNA. It seems to me that it may be getting overwritten > someplace downstream. I don't think DNA would have just inserted XXXXXXXXXX > by itself. > > Can you confirm from the SIP trace (either Real Time from RTMT or 'debug > ccsip messages' on the CUBE) that you are actually sending the right > 01509XXXXXX information? > > Dave Wolgast > Geneseo, NY > > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:59 AM Gary Parker <g.j.par...@lboro.ac.uk> > wrote: > >> Afternoon all, I’ve got a problem I’ve been struggling with for a few >> days now. It’s bound to be something simple I’ve forgotten from my CCNA >> Voice days (a long time ago!). >> >> I’m running CUCM 12.5 SU4 with GBNP 1.1(31) and 2921 voice gateways >> operating as CUBE with IOS 15.5(3)M2 in the UK >> >> Background: >> I’m in the process of migrating our outbound PSTN dialling from our >> Virgin Media Business PRI circuits to SIP trunks provided by Gamma. The >> problem I’ve encountered is with local rate calls with no area code. Our >> PRIs will happily route outbound six digit dialled numbers but the SIP >> trunks will not. I suspect this is a common problem, and will only become >> more common in the UK as Ofcom removes the obligation on TSPs to provide >> local dialling: >> >> >> https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2021/04/ofcom-will-stop-requiring-uk-phone-providers-to-offer-local-dialling.html >> >> Problem: >> I though this would be a relatively simple task of adding Prefix Digits >> (Outgoing Calls) of my area code (01509) to all calls matching the LOCAL >> route filter using a Route Pattern. At first glance, Dialled Number >> Analyzer shows that Dialled Digits of eg. 9112233 gets transformed to >> Called Party Number of 01509112233 >> >> • Results Summary >> • Calling Party Information >> • Dialed Digits = 9112233 >> • Match Result = RouteThisPattern >> • Matched Pattern Information >> • Called Party Number = 01509112233 >> • Time Zone = Etc/GMT >> • End Device = Lboro_SIP_Test >> • Call Classification = OffNet >> • InterDigit Timeout = NO >> • Device Override = Disabled >> • Outside Dial Tone = NO >> • Call Flow >> • Alternate Matches >> >> However calls via the SIP TSP fail with a 404 as the dialled number is >> still “123456” when I look at debug on the voice gateway. >> >> Looking more closely at the DNA output it appears that the post-transform >> Called Number at the Route Pattern level isn’t being passed to the Route >> List: >> >> >> • Call Flow >> • Route Pattern :Pattern= 9.@ >> • Positional Match List = >> • DialPlan = United Kingdom Numbering Plan >> • Route Filter >> • Require Forced Authorization Code = No >> • Authorization Level = 0 >> • Require Client Matter Code = No >> • Call Classification = OffNet >> • PreTransform Calling Party Number = 445566 >> • PreTransform Called Party Number = 9112233 >> • Calling Party Transformations >> • External Phone Number Mask = YES >> • Calling Party Mask = XXXXXXXXXX >> • Prefix = >> • CallingLineId Presentation = Allowed >> • CallingName Presentation = Allowed >> • Calling Party Number = >> • ConnectedParty Transformations >> • ConnectedLineId Presentation = Default >> • ConnectedName Presentation = Default >> • Called Party Transformations >> • Called Party Mask = >> • Discard Digits Instruction = PreDot >> • Prefix = 01509 >> Correct here -> • Called Number = 01509112233 >> • Route List :Route List Name= Lboro_SIP_Test >> • RouteGroup :RouteGroup Name= >> LBORO_SIP_Gamma-TEST-RG >> • PreTransform Calling Party Number = >> 445566 >> Incorrect here -> • PreTransform Called Party Number = >> 9112233 >> >> >> >> Why are the transformations I make at the Route List level being dropped >> when the call gets to the Route Group? I understand that Route List/Group >> transformations override Route Pattern transformations, but I’m not doing >> any transformations at the Route List/Group level beside Discard Digits, >> GBNP: PreDot. This is necessary as, again, although PreDot is applied at >> the Route Pattern level the ‘9’ is back again when we get to the Route >> Group. >> >> FYI, I’m using "Use Calling Party's External Phone Number Mask” to >> correctly apply the area code to CallingPartyNumber in outgoing calls, but >> that’s not reflected in DNA. External calling party number is always >> 01509XXXXXX >> >> --- >> /-Gary Parker----------------------------------f--\ >> | Unified Communications Service Manager | >> n Loughborough University, IT Services | >> | tel:+441509635635 sip:g...@lboro.ac.uk o >> | https://www.osx.ninja/pubkey.txt | >> \r----------------------------------------------d-/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip