We settled on SU1 with no ES. They make us nervous. There’s a certificate issue that is fixed with SU2 I believe. We needed TAC root access to upload certs for smart licensing to work.
From: JASON BURWELL <jason.burw...@foundersfcu.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 2:39 PM To: Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca>; voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] UCCX 12.5(1) SU2 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to ith...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:ith...@uoguelph.ca> I’m curious as well. We also just went to 12.5(1) SU1 with latest ES package. I was considering going to SU2 instead but decided not to go that route since it had only come out days before my planned upgrade. I have not read to see if there are feature enhancements or if its just bugfixes. Jason From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 1:17 PM To: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>) <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] UCCX 12.5(1) SU2 Who out there has been brave enough to apply SU2? We just finished upgrading to 12.5(1) SU1 since all our prepwork was done with SU1. We weren’t willing to apply something that was only just released in the case an SU2a was on it’s way. 😉
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip