Anyone know who #1025 is?

-----Original Message-----
From: Trevor Corness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCIE (ScanMail Checked: Virus Free!)


The CCIE # started at 1025, so in generality:
  # of CCIE's = CCIE # - 1024 +/- probably 20 or 30

The number is assigned to the testing center in blocks, so it is not totally
contiguous..  It does give a good estimate though.

eg. I believe Joe's # 5917 (just confirmed, checked an email from him ;p)
  so.. at his time of certification,

  x = 5917 - 1024 +/- 25
  x = 4893 +/- 25
  x = ~4868 - 4918, somewhere around that range.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the way I understand it.. the
+/- 20-30 is only a guess on my part for the "pool" of CCIE #'s not yet
assigned at other stations.

Regards,
  Trevor Corness, CCNA MCSE MCP+Internet

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 10:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE (ScanMail Checked: Virus Free!)


>Just curious does anyone know what the CCIE number is up to?...meaning
how
>mant CCIE's are out there?

I guess it's around where Joe Martin is. # 59xx thereabouts.


___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to