Nathan,
The SVC model was originally probably phone calls. Call brings up and tears down a
circuit dynamically and calls can be muxed into larger ATM data pipes. Then with
data, came core
ATM networks with edge routers static mapped, then CLIPed, and then LANEd. These use
many dynamic conenctions. But it is really not that different from Frame Relay or
X.25. If I am not
incorrect, it is an ISDN call based control function that handles the setup/tear down
signalling. SVC's are usually any connections that are made dynamically as opposed to
a PVC that
is permanently nailed in place.. I don't know if there would be a standard model for
an SVC.
HTH :)
Larry
Nathan Day wrote:
> This is not a fully related Cisco question, but thought some of you here might have
>some insight.
>
> What is the standard model for using ATM SVC's over the WAN. The only method I can
>think of would be MPOA. I am not sure if there is a simpler way of making the VC
>establishment.
>
> This may seem like a stupid statement.
>
> Any insight would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Nate
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Are you a Techie? Get Your Free Tech Email Address Now!
> Many to choose from! Visit http://www.TechEmail.com
>
> ------- End of forwarded message -------
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Are you a Techie? Get Your Free Tech Email Address Now!
> Many to choose from! Visit http://www.TechEmail.com
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Lawrence Dwyer, MCSE CCNA
Sherikon, Inc
301-619-7946
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
